Old Bollywood was our nursery for Urdu. Where else could you get Tamaam gawaahon ke bayanat and memberaan-e-jury ki sifaarish ke maddenazar? There were always fasadat, khayalat in our films. In between there were some exceptions like Khayalon mein kisi ke is tarah aaya nahin karte. But soon it was back to Ye meri khwahish ye khayalat kise pesh karun.

Those days I got hooked to Urdu language. There was a local announcer who was known as Patna’s Ameen Sayani. With the difference that whereas Ameen Sayani started with Behno aur bhaaiyo, our local Ameen Sayani’s trademark was Khawateen-o-hazraat, Main Diwali ke muqaddas mauke par aap sabka khair maqdam karta hun. Sometimes, he became more flowery: Aaj ki mehfil ke sadr Janab.., Hazreen-e-mehfil, tamam khawateen-o-hazraat..  

{ 3 comments }

And the SOY Award for the best male solo of 1956 goes to ?

The 1950s are an era of plenty. This was the period when all the greats of the Golden Era were going great guns, creating their best music. Having said that, Naushad, one of the greatest, was absent in the year, but others were active. We are moving in tandem with review of 1939 songs. While in this year nothing was known about the singers of 61% songs, in 1956 that kind of unknown is less than 6%. All the great male playback singers – Rafi, Mukesh, Manna Dey, Hemant Kumar, Talat Mahmood and Kishore Kumar – were singing outstanding songs. Talat Mahmood is an interesting case. Among the great male playback singers, he faded the earliest. He shone like a meteor in the early 50s; and late 50s onwards, his best was over. In the year 1956, we find a number of his memorable duets, but his great solos are few and far between. Contrast this with his spectacular songs up to 1955. Mahendra Kapoor’s glorious period was yet to arrive.

 

{ 15 comments }

In the Vintage Era review of songs, we have reached the end of the 30s. In a stark reminder of our poor record of preserving our legacy, our Resident Scholar, N Venkataraman, gives a stark figure that only 4 Hindi films – Pukar, Aadmi, Dushman, Durga – are available in public domain for viewing. These are from famous production houses: Minerva; Prabhat; New Theatres and Bombay Talkies. Talking of Venkataraman ji, he is a great asset to SOY. In addition to songs, he was very prompt in correcting any inaccuracy in historical (general history) details.

It appears some good quality video links of songs beyond the above four films are available on the YouTube. In my Overview Post, I had given a broad statistics that of the total number of songs in which song titles are known in the year, in less than 40% of the songs singers are known. It is not surprising that so much of our music is just not available. That is no reason for the mental barrier some music lovers feel in accessing the Vintage Era music. But they all have a sense of discovering never heard before gems.

The comments veered over great deal of history of that period, sometimes with a generous dollop of opinions. Overall, a very satisfying discussion. I thank all the participants for their active participation.

Coming back to the Wrap Up 1 about Best Male Solos, this was the era of KL Saigal (Dushman) and Pankaj Mullick (Kapalkundala) and they did sing everlasting songs which are remembered till date. I find Jagmohan’s Mujhe na sapnon se bahlaao is also from this year. This has to be one of his earliest non-film songs, and it is among his most recognizable songs.  

{ 18 comments }

What happens if a parent has a petulant, confused child, who is given to throwing tantrums before guests. The parents would be embarrassed, but the guests may comfort them: what a lovely child! But if the child displays aggressive behaviour – unless you give him his chocolate or allow him to watch YouTube videos, he would not eat, and starts breaking things, you might refer to books on parenting, and come across technical terms like ADHD. But what if the child is 79 plus, Commander-in-Chief of the most powerful army in the world, and has the power to destroy the world many times over? You start worrying. Because the doctors do not use the term ADHD for a 79-year old, going to be 80.

 

{ 96 comments }

I have been forced into temporary inactivity. During such periods I can do nothing but contemplate on some issues. I find thinking about Iran-US-Israel War, the Middle East crisis quite mind boggling, so I reflect on simple things like the Hindi film songs. Of late, my mind has been reflecting on the pairs, Aaiye & Chale aaiye; Jaaiye & Chale jaaiye. Is there a difference or are they the same? It seems there is indeed a difference in the connotation of Aaiye and Chale aaiye and Jaaiye and Chale jaiye. It appears to me that the addition of the adverb adds an extra degree of pleading. Look at these pairs:  

{ 133 comments }

Wishing all the readers and their families a very Happy Holi, and the greetings for the ongoing month of the Ramdan. May the Almighty shower all His blessings on everyone

DP Rangan has set romance in the air with his “Love is Bliss”. This is the season when the dullest person starts feeling desirous. I remember a folk proverb, “Phagun mein budhwa devar laage. In the context of Hindi films, it generally refers to the romance for a person. I have explored romances for various types: Romancing the pardesi balma; Romancing the stranger, Romancing the beimaan balma, Romancing the anaadi balma. and so on. But the romance can be for inanimate objects also. The news and social media are full of pictures of hordes of tourists descending upon Japan to watch its cherry blossoms. Northern Lights are eternal favourites. There are people crazy for Stonehenge and Machu Picchu. Apart from resources and time, one has to have a wanderlust. Some may feel, it is quite discordant to talk about romance in the midst of the raging Epic Fury in the Middle East, और भी ग़म हैं ज़माने में मोहब्बत के सिवा, but the life has to move on.  

{ 66 comments }

Best songs of 1956

24 February 2026

And the winners are

Readers would be surprised to see this post, and I must say, some very pleasantly. Because for the last few years there has been a growing clamour that I should go forwards from 1956 onwards. The reasons given are: (i) It is difficult to relate to Vintage Era music, most people have a mental barrier the moment we go to music of the 1930s and 1940s, (ii) A large number of films and music of the Vintage Era are no longer in the public domain. All valid points, and I have decided to relent and here is the discussion on the Best Songs of 1956.

Why 1956? And I have to recapitulate the years when I started the year-wise review of songs. Some active members – no longer active on the SOY – suggested that I do year-wise review of years before the Filmfare Awards were instituted going back to when the talkies started. The idea was perhaps that Filmfare Awards were not a true measure of quality of the music and Filmfare Awards started from 1952 with Baiju Bawra. Later, I discovered there were gap years in 1953 and 1955. Hence the detailed coverage started for the years 1955, 1953 and 1951 backwards. The readers may read to appreciate the first post in the series, i.e. Best songs of 1955. Now that the beginning of the talkies 1931, when it all started, is in sight, I have pleasure in discussing the Best songs of 1956. So every year you would have two reviews – a Vintage Year, and a year from 1956 onwards.

 

{ 61 comments }

Love is Bliss

14 February 2026

Wishing everyone a very Happy Valentine’s Day with guest article by DP Rangan

(Our mid-octogenarian guest author today is an ever romantic. PG Wodehouse, Agatha Christie, Cricket, Bridge, Sherlock Holmes, History, Mathematics – his range of interests is limitless. An eternal peripatetic, he drops in India for change of his laundry, or medicines, during Spring when love is in the air. He is about to come back from US/Canada next month for a short visit to Delhi when the weather is conducive here. This is the time when Mr Rangan thought of resuming his writing for Songs Of Yore. “Love is Bliss” is the result of that yearning. He has written a trilogy of love articles for the blog a few years back. Mr Rangan explains how this one is distinct from his earlier love articles. It is my pleasure to welcome him.

Thank you Mr Rangan for this excellent offering. For newcomers, Mr Rangan is a retired senior government official. – AK)

Love between male and female of a species has been in vogue since many aeons with the aim of creating progenies for survival of next generation and beyond. It is a fundamental axiom of life for perpetuation. Birds are a classic example of love dances with gay abandon. Human beings are no less accomplished.

I had already contributed three posts on the theme. I consider it an over simplification to confine them into rigid patterns. It can be interpreted in various ways. I am exploring this aspect and am aiming to inflict another post on the site by coaxing our blog master. But that is far into the future.

 

{ 30 comments }

Forgotten Artists of Early Cinema and The Same Name Confusion Book 5
Author: Arunkumar Deshmukh
Publisher: Professor toofaani publishers, East Lansing, MI, USA
Price (Pothi.com): ₹599 plus shipping (Paperback)
Copyright: © Arunkumar Deshmukh
Pages: 146

This is the fifth book in the series, and I have reviewed all the earlier books on this site. I am very pleased about Arunkumar Deshmukh’s output, as I used to say that Arun ji had many books in him. I have the satisfaction of my prediction coming right. Besides this series of books, Arun ji has also brought out some other books under other titles.

Arun ji has kept one feature common in this series of the books to maintain interest. In the picture on the cover page of every Book, at least one would be a familiar face and you are curious who are the other three. For example, in the Book 5, out of four thumbnail pictures I could recognise at least one – of Charlie at the top right-hand corner. He was a famous comedian of the early era, and Johnny Walker acknowledged that he was inspired by him. When Charlie was at the top, he earned more than many eminent heroes and he was wealthier than them.

However, I must mention right at the beginning that Arun ji has not maintained the same care in the content. As I glanced through the book, I had a nagging feeling that some material I had come across earlier. As I glanced, I found that at least two profiles had occurred earlier- RC Boral in Book 3 (p. 97) and Kamal Dasgupta in Book 2 (p. 85). Since the source material must be the same, the write-ups are more or less similar. There is some updation in Kamal Dasgupta, but RC Boral seems to be a cut and paste job.

But I am jumping ahead of myself. PART ONE of the book contains 48 profiles of “Forgotten Lesser-Known Artists”. This has to be understood in relative terms. Because some names are quite familiar to those aware of the broad history of our films, which would be the most followers of SOY. For example, Amirbai Karnataki, RC Boral, Himanshu Rai, Leela Chitnis, Vasant Desai, Timir Baran, KN Singh, Karan Dewan etc. There would be some in the middle. Some surely unknown, such as Ram Singh, Nayampalli etc. PART TWO contains five pairs or triads on similar names. They cause no end of confusion. Trying to remove the confusion has been a singular contribution of Arun ji. For example, among the same set of names I would strongly recommend Naseem Bano-Naseem Akhtar, and several Manohar’s (Manohar Sonik, Manohar Arora and Manoharlal Khanna). We are familiar with the perils of the same name confusion. It happened once with the famous singer Shamshad Begum. An intensely private person, there was a news item of the death of Shamshad Begum in 1998. The reporter and most people erroneously believed that the singer had passed away, But Shamshad Begum who had passed away was a small-time actress by that name who happened to be the mother of this Naseem Bano, and the grandmother of Saira Bano.

PART THREE titled “Look What I Found” contains four articles with catchy titles: “Why do film artists hide their first films/ roles, songs”; “Germans in Hindi film industry”; “Studios spoiled their careers”’; “How they died”. These titles indicate what they contain, these are quite informative and interesting. PART FOUR of the Book, “Special Articles” contains, as the name suggests some articles of special interest. These are also highly informative. I would especially draw attention to “Studios spoiled their careers”. Along with some others, Shantaram also figures in not very flattering terms in this respect. This would match with what I said in response to one of the comments on the review of the songs of 1939. The last “Special Articles” also has some very informative articles, such as “Failure of Star Sons”, “Animals in Films”.

Coming back to Para 3 of my review, with all the painstaking efforts the book has some careless proof-reading mistakes. For example, random use of small letters and capital letters are quite jarring. Why should Prithviraj Kapoor’s surname be written with small ‘k’ or if someone was suffering from cancer, why should it be written with capitals?

At this stage of his output, I dare to give some suggestions to Arun ji: Pause for a while and review what you have achieved. Make an Index of all the profiles you have written so far, so that you avoid duplications. Be consistent with small letters and capitals, and general proof reading. My congratulations all the same to Arun ji on his awesome achievement.

{ 11 comments }

1939 best songs

26 January 2026

Wishing everyone a very Happy 76th Anniversary of our Republic Day

Now we are entering the thirties, the last stretch going back to when it all began. The first talkie film was made in 1931. Most of the early stars of talkie films carried on from the silent era. The change of era also exposed the shortcomings of many silent film superstars in adjusting to the demands of talkie films, mainly in dialogue delivery and singing abilities. Some made a gradual exit. This also sowed the seeds of professional playback singing. The playback technology had been discovered in 1935/1937, but the constraints of recording technology meant that it was yet to be fully operational in practice. All this turmoil meant that the change of era did not herald a complete transition from silent to talkie era. Silent films still continued to be made for quite a good number of years into the talkie era. The year 1939 was the end of the 30s. Therefore by 1939 the last silent film must have been made a few years ago. Here I am not talking about largely silent films like Pushpak (1987) and Black, which were largely silent because of artistic reasons, just as Schindler’s List (1993) was a b&w film.  

{ 56 comments }